Skip to content
ArticleEducation4 min

Should we hire or outsource?

A decision every growing business makes several times a year and most students have never had to. The considerations that actually decide it, from people who have done both and regretted each at least once.

A business has more work than its people can do. It can hire somebody, or pay an outside firm or freelancer to do it. Students treat this as a cost comparison and reach for a spreadsheet. Owners who have done it treat it as a question about what the work is, how long it will last, and what they can afford to get wrong.

Here is how the decision looks from inside.

What you should come away with

  • The comparison is not salary against invoice; a hire costs far more than their pay and an outsourcer costs more than their quote
  • Outsource what is standard; hire what is yours
  • A hire is a commitment measured in years; ask whether the work will still be there
  • Whoever does the work learns from it — decide who you want holding that knowledge
  • The wrong hire costs more than a year of outsourcing, and takes longer to undo

The first correction an owner makes to a student's analysis is to the numbers. A salary is not the cost of an employee. Add the statutory contributions, the equipment, the desk, the management time, the training months when they produce little, the leave, and the cost of the manager's attention when things go wrong. The real figure is usually well above the salary. Equally, the outsourcer's quote is not the cost of outsourcing. Add the time spent briefing them, the revisions, the things they did not know about your business, and the fact that you will pay again the next time. Neither number is what it looks like.

The second consideration is the nature of the work, and this is the one that decides most cases. Is it standard — accounts, payroll, a website, legal filings, the kind of thing every business needs and that specialists do all day? Then an outsider will do it better and cheaper than a person you hire to do it part-time, and there is no reason for that knowledge to live inside your company. Or is it the thing your business actually is — the product, the customer relationships, the process that makes you different? That should be done by people who work for you, because it is the thing you cannot afford to have leave with a contract.

The third is duration. A hire is a commitment of years, morally and often legally. If the work is a three-month project, hiring for it means either letting somebody go afterwards or finding them something else to do. If the work will still be there in two years and is growing, paying an outsider month after month is paying a premium to avoid a decision.

The fourth is about knowledge, and owners feel it more than students expect. Whoever does the work learns from it: what customers actually ask for, where the process breaks, what the numbers really say. If that person is an outsider, that knowledge leaves at the end of the contract and you buy it again from somebody new. If they are inside, it compounds. Founders describe outsourcing something for years and realising nobody in the company understood it any more.

The fifth is risk, and specifically the cost of being wrong. A bad outsourcing decision costs a few months and some money, and you end it. A bad hire costs the salary, the months of hoping it improves, the effect on the rest of the team, and the difficult conversation — and then you start again. Owners who have made a bad hire describe it as one of the most expensive mistakes available to a small business, which is why they are slower to hire than a spreadsheet would suggest and faster to try an outsider first.

The sixth is control, which cuts both ways. An employee can be redirected on a Tuesday afternoon. An outsourcer has a scope, a contract and other clients. When the work is predictable, that does not matter. When it changes weekly, it matters a great deal.

So the practitioner's answer is rarely one or the other. It is: outsource the standard things and get them off your desk; hire slowly for the work that is genuinely yours, once you are sure it will last; and when you are not sure, try an outsider first, because it is the cheaper mistake.

TopicsHuman ResourcesLeadershipOperations

Come to the session it came from

Reading it is useful. Being in the room and asking your own question is better.